lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: f_ops flag to speed up compatible ioctls in linux kernel
    Hello!
    Please do not mail me directly.

    Quoting viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk) "Re: f_ops flag to speed up compatible ioctls in linux kernel":
    > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:22:45AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
    > > 2. there's a performance huge overhead for each compat call - there's
    > > a hash lookup in a global hash inside a lock_kernel -
    > > and I think compat performance *is* important.
    > >
    > > Further, adding a command to the ioctl suddenly requires changing
    > > two places - registration code and ioctl itself.
    >
    > So don't add them. Adding a new ioctl is *NOT* a step to be taken lightly -
    > we used to be far too accepting in that area and as somebody who'd waded
    > through the resulting dungpiles over the last months I can tell you that
    > result is utterly revolting.

    Why make it a bigger dungpile then?
    And what about the performance overhead?

    MST
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.021 / U:30.552 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site