[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] kernel events layer

    > > Should there be some sharing with the device naming of sysfs or are
    > > will we introduce a new one? ie sysfs uses:
    > >
    > > devices/system/cpu/cpu0/<blah>
    > >
    > > Would it be a better way to have a version that takes struct kobject
    > > to enforce consistency in the device naming scheme. This also means
    > > userspace would automatically know where to look in /sys if futher
    > > info was needed.
    > No, we want to give an interface that matches the sort of provider URI
    > used by object systems such as CORBA, D-BUS, and DCOP. We also do _not_
    > want to put policy in the kernel.

    Funny... you want to create new namespace and argue "no policy".

    If you want to translate it to something URI-like, you should
    do that in userspace.

    64 bytes from icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.018 / U:16.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site