[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] implement in-kernel keys & keyring management
    On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 09:27:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > Yes. However, I don't see that the kernel really would ask for new keys
    > very often. Any normal operation is that you have the key already.

    Key might not be there though, leading to many repeated requests. Three

    1) A netlink binary "server" looks a hell of a lot like a nameserver, and
    those are a roaring success in terms of stability and performance. When
    considering nameservers other than bind, I'd also add security and leanness
    to that list.

    2) One can also send text over datagrams (think SIP)

    3) Debugging netlink communications is actually not that hard as other
    processes can listen in on netlink communications given certain settings,
    think 'netlinkdump'. Especially easy when doing ASCII over netlink!


    -- Open source, database driven DNS Software Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.020 / U:1.484 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site