Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Aug 2004 23:45:29 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement |
| |
Hubertus asked: > While we are on the topic, do you envision these sets to be somewhat > hierarchical or simply a flat hierarchy ?
I'm not sure what you mean by the distinction between a "somewhat" hierarchy and a "simply flat" hierarchy ... I'll guess you're asking how deep we envision these sets being.
I'd envision they start out just one or two deep, then over time they tend to reflect the several layer deep organizational structure of the institution paying for the big iron, _plus_ another layer or two to handle the cpu/memory placement needs of more complex applications.
With occassional examples a few times that.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |