[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: PATCH: fix some 32bit isms
    On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:03:05AM +0100, wrote:
    > > It should be %zu, since size_t is unsigned.
    > >
    > > %zd is appropriate for ssize_t.
    > It's signed (and not a ssize_t, while we are at it). If you want to be
    > pedantic, use %td since we are dealing with ptrdiff_t here.


    We are not doing homegrown offsetof(), so it's really size_t. My apologies.

    Yes, that should be> %zu (OTOH, %zd will do the same unless we have 2Gb
    struct somewhere ;-)

    > BTW, we ought to add 't' modifier in vsnpritf()...
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.019 / U:39.100 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site