lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 06 Aug 2004 10:33:54 +0200
FromHelge Hafting <>
SubjectRe: Severe I/O performance regression 2.6.6 to 2.6.7 or 2.6.8-rc3
William Lee Irwin III wrote:

>At some point in the past, I wrote:
>
>>-r+ -d:KEY: > key-bk$X" when it creates the tarball.  Then anyone can
>>"bk clone -r`cat key-bk7` linux-2.5 linux-2.6-bk7" and duplicate the
>>-bk7 state of the tree, and then "bk changes -L ../linux-2.6-bk6" to
>>find the list of changesets differing.
>> 
>>
>
>Once we get there, there must be some way to construct intermediate
>points between those two faithful at the very least to the snapshot
>ordering if not true chronological ordering.
> 
>
You don't really need chronology for a binary search.  With a
list of changesets, just apply/back out half of them.  Divide the lot
any way you like, perhaps starting with only the "suspected" ones.

Helge Hafting
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2008