[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: SCHED_BATCH and SCHED_BATCH numbering
    Albert Cahalan wrote:
    > On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 23:06, Nick Piggin wrote:
    >>Peter Williams wrote:
    >>>Nick Piggin wrote:
    >>>>However if you add or remove scheduling policies, your
    >>>>p->policy method breaks.
    >>>Not if Albert's numbering system is used.
    >>What if another realtime policy is added? Or one is removed?
    > What if, what if...
    > You're going to have to change the code anyway.
    > One might toss this into <linux/sched.h> to make
    > as a nice reminder:

    I'm not saying your renumbering is a bad idea, but making the
    argument that it would simplify rt_task is bogus.

    > As it is now, SCHED_FIFO is already used as a
    > bit flag in one place.

    But it isn't a bit flag, we're just lucky it works. Submit a
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.036 / U:14.412 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site