[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH]
In article <> (at Thu, 5 Aug 2004 22:47:12 -0400 (EDT)), James Morris <> says:

> > Would you be against a patch to cryptoapi to have access to a
> > non-scatter-list set of calls?
> level. Can you demonstrate a compelling need for raw access to the
> algorithms via the API?

I would use them for
- Privacy Extensions (RFC3041) support
- upcoming TCP MD5 signature (RFC2385) support
since I don't see the advantage(s) of sg for allocated memories there.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.054 / U:0.976 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site