[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH]
    On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Jean-Luc Cooke wrote:

    > Would you be against a patch to cryptoapi to have access to a
    > non-scatter-list set of calls?
    > I know a few people would like to see that , and I would also like to use
    > some low-level:
    > crypto_digest_update_byte(struct digest_alg *digest,
    > unsigned char *buf,
    > unsigned int nbytes);
    > crypto_cipher_encrypt_byte(struct cipher_alg *cipher,
    > unsigned char *dst,
    > unsigned char *src,
    > unsigned int nbytes);
    > I'm in the middle of preparing for a paper and would like to get code running
    > without scatterlists.

    The idea of the scatterlist API is to encourage encryption at the page
    level. Can you demonstrate a compelling need for raw access to the
    algorithms via the API?

    - James
    James Morris

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.019 / U:11.636 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site