Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Aug 2004 08:57:08 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: SCHED_BATCH and SCHED_BATCH numbering |
| |
* Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net> wrote:
> Are these going to be numbered consecutively, or might they better be > done like the task state? [...]
this is quite unnecessary at the moment since p->prio < MAX_RT_PRIO is a good enough check - but whenever the way p->prio works is changed it will be easy to introduce a PF_REALTIME flag that is set/cleared in setscheduler(). (instead of playing around with p->policy.)
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |