lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectSCHED_BATCH and SCHED_BATCH numbering
    From
    Date
    Are these going to be numbered consecutively, or might
    they better be done like the task state? SCHED_FIFO is
    in fact already treated this way in one place. One might
    want to test values this way:

    if(foo & (SCHED_ISO|SCHED_RR|SCHED_FIFO)) ...

    (leaving aside SCHED_OTHER==0, or just translate
    that single value for the ABI)

    I'd like to see these get permenant allocations
    soon, even if the code doesn't go into the kernel.
    This is because user-space needs to know the values.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.019 / U:0.624 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site