lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectSCHED_BATCH and SCHED_BATCH numbering
From
Date
Are these going to be numbered consecutively, or might
they better be done like the task state? SCHED_FIFO is
in fact already treated this way in one place. One might
want to test values this way:

if(foo & (SCHED_ISO|SCHED_RR|SCHED_FIFO)) ...
(leaving aside SCHED_OTHER==0, or just translate
that single value for the ABI)

I'd like to see these get permenant allocations
soon, even if the code doesn't go into the kernel.
This is because user-space needs to know the values.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans