[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectSCHED_BATCH and SCHED_BATCH numbering
    Are these going to be numbered consecutively, or might
    they better be done like the task state? SCHED_FIFO is
    in fact already treated this way in one place. One might
    want to test values this way:

    if(foo & (SCHED_ISO|SCHED_RR|SCHED_FIFO)) ...

    (leaving aside SCHED_OTHER==0, or just translate
    that single value for the ABI)

    I'd like to see these get permenant allocations
    soon, even if the code doesn't go into the kernel.
    This is because user-space needs to know the values.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.018 / U:16.496 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site