[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectSCHED_BATCH and SCHED_BATCH numbering
Are these going to be numbered consecutively, or might
they better be done like the task state? SCHED_FIFO is
in fact already treated this way in one place. One might
want to test values this way:


(leaving aside SCHED_OTHER==0, or just translate
that single value for the ABI)

I'd like to see these get permenant allocations
soon, even if the code doesn't go into the kernel.
This is because user-space needs to know the values.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.094 / U:1.396 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site