[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH]atomic_inc_return() for i386/x86_64 (Re: RCU issue with SELinux)
Hi Andi, thanks for your comment.
Sorry, I have not noticed your mail in the flood of Linux-Kernel ML.

> > atomic_inc_return() is not defined for arm,arm26,i386,x86_64 and um archtectures.
> > This attached patch adds atomic_inc_return() and atomic_dec_return() to arm,i386 and x86_64.
> >
> > It is implemented by 'xaddl' operation with LOCK prefix for i386 and x86_64.
> > But this operation is permitted after i486 processor only.
> > Another implementation may be necessary for i386SX/DX processor.
> > But 'xaddl' operation is used in 'include/asm-i386/rwsem.h' unconditionally.
> > I think it has agreed on using 'xaddl' operation in past days.
> We don't support SMP on 386 boxes. What you can do for 386 is to use
> alternative() and just use an non SMP safe version for 386 and xadd
> for 486+

We can avoid the problem by the simple solution, since SMP
on 386 boxes isn't supported. It is to disable interrupt
while updating atomic_t variable.

The attached patch modifies the include/asm-i386/atomic.h.
If the target processor is 386, then atomic_add_return() use
non-atomic operations between local_irq_disable() and local_irq_enable().
Otherwise, atomic_add_return() use 'xadd' operation with LOCK prefix.

By the way, do you know why 'xadd' operation is used
unconditionally in 'include/asm-i386/rwsem.h'?


Signed-off-by: KaiGai, Kohei <>
Signed-off-by: Takayoshi Kochi <>
Kai Gai <>
[unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.066 / U:6.704 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site