Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:41:30 -0400 | From | Neil Horman <> | Subject | Re: [DOC] Linux kernel patch submission format |
| |
Jeff Garzik wrote: > > I tried to keep it as short as possible: here is a page describing the > most optimal format for sending patches to Linux kernel developers. > > http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html > > This URL should be permanent, feel free to bookmark it. > Comments welcome. > > Jeff > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
So, this may already be asked and answered (apologies if it has), but is it worth gpg-signing submissions so that authenticity can be verified to some degree when a patch is posted (and for archival purposes)? I ask because this is whats done on the fedora extras channel when updates get pushed, and it seems like a reasonable addition to the process. Neil
-- /*************************************************** *Neil Horman *Software Engineer *Red Hat, Inc. *nhorman@redhat.com *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1 *http://pgp.mit.edu ***************************************************/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |