![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi, while i do agree that this patch is needed and should do what it is supposed to do i'm still wondering what the idea behind pci_map_single() returning inaccessible DMA addresses is. The pci layer knows that the device can only handle addresses up to 1GB. For what reasons should it return addresses above that limit? Reading the DMA-mappings.txt didn't reveal an answer so maybe someone can shed some light onto this topic? Thanks, Florian Pekka Pietikainen wrote: >On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:49:28PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > >>>BTW, can someone fixup something for me? Update MODULE_AUTHOR() >>>please :-) 3/4 of this driver have been rewritten since I last >>>touched it, heh. >>> >>> >>hehe. I'll take care of it tonight when I queue Florian's stuff >>to netdev-2.6 (and thus -mm, and thus eventually mainline). >> >> >And here's a resend of the bounce buffer patch, which should still >apply on top of Florians (or without) just fine. > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||