lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] new CSA patchset for 2.6.8
    On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 08:53:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > Thanks, guys. So we now know that there are three potential
    > implementations which do much the same thing, yes?

    I believe CSA does than the others.

    > I didn't get a sense of a preferred direction, but at least nobody is
    > flaming anybody else yet ;)
    >
    > It strikes me that CSA is the most actively developed and is the furthest
    > along. But that enhancing BSD accounting might be the least intrusive and
    > most back-compatible approach.
    >
    > Is that a fair summary? If not, what should I have said?

    Does anyone know if CSA is a super-set of BSD accounting and ELSA?
    What would be missing?

    I'm unconvinced that enhancing BSD accounting to encompass the
    capabilities of CSA is appropriate.

    I think we can make the data collection additions common. That should
    encompass the bulk of the invasive changes that are required by at least
    CSA proper (ie there are still the PAGG changes for job support that we
    can discuss separately). Not sure about BSD accounting and ELSA.

    With that cooperation, we can then either proceed with further
    cooperation, or if the goals and users of the different accounting
    approaches dictate different kernel modules and user support,
    I'd propose that might be OK.

    John
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.047 / U:0.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site