[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] V-3.0 Single Priority Array O(1) CPU Scheduler Evaluation
> But let me re-repeat again that CPU scheduler problems tend to take a
> _long_ time to turn up - you make some change and two months later some
> person with a weird workload on expensive hardware hits a nasty corner
> case. So I do think that we'd have to hit a nasty problem with the current
> scheduler to go making deep changes.

How about just simplifying the code? Both Con's and Peter's code
look a lot simpler compared to the stock scheduler and are easier
to understand. If they don't work significantly worse I think that
would be a strong argument to move to one of them.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.050 / U:1.320 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site