[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] V-3.0 Single Priority Array O(1) CPU Scheduler Evaluation
    > But let me re-repeat again that CPU scheduler problems tend to take a
    > _long_ time to turn up - you make some change and two months later some
    > person with a weird workload on expensive hardware hits a nasty corner
    > case. So I do think that we'd have to hit a nasty problem with the current
    > scheduler to go making deep changes.

    How about just simplifying the code? Both Con's and Peter's code
    look a lot simpler compared to the stock scheduler and are easier
    to understand. If they don't work significantly worse I think that
    would be a strong argument to move to one of them.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.021 / U:1.352 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site