lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: silent semantic changes with reiser4


    On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote:
    >
    > OK, forget getcwd(). What does lookup of .. do from that point? *Especially*
    > for stuff you've got from regular files. That's the decision that needs to
    > be made.

    I think that will decide on whether we expose attributes through the
    normal namespace or not.

    If we do expose them in the normal namespace, then ".." should work the
    way the namespace looks: if you do ".." on the "attribute directory" of a
    file, you get the directory that the file was in. Ie an old-style
    user-space "getcwd()" would give the right path (well, an old-style
    user-space getcwd() would probably refuse the file on the base that it is
    S_IFREG, but ignoring that..)

    If we _don't_ expose it in the normal namespace, we should should either
    just error out (logically you'd get the file itself, but I really don't
    wan tto have ".." return a non-directory, because _that_ really might
    confuse things), or you'd just return the same directory (ie it would be a
    "local root" in the namespace you got moved to).

    So let's try to be self-consistent with how we expose it in the normal
    namespace.

    Linus
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.032 / U:34.716 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site