Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 28 Aug 2004 19:20:56 +0000 | From | Chris Meadors <> | Subject | Re: reverse engineering pwcx |
| |
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> But 160x120 sounds pretty ridiculous. It still would be possible to > scale that to 640x480 smoothly, but the image would be obviously blurry > and just awful even with avanced Bayer-based scaling techniques.
That sounds about right. At 640x480 the QuickCam 3000 is an awful blurry mess. Though I think the actual pixel count would be a multiple (divisor) of CIF, because in the nCIF resolutions it seems to expose more pixels. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |