Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:09:51 -0700 | From | "David S. Miller" <> | Subject | Re: maintaining DRM and using bitkeeper.. |
| |
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:54:06 +0100 (IST) Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> wrote:
> This is my main issue with using bitkeeper vs separate patches, if I check > the macro conversion into bitkeeper as separate patches each removing a > couple of inter-related macros (this is my intention... it is what I did > in the DRM CVS tree) and I ask Linus to pull it from a tree, will it not > look like one big patch (albeit in a number of changesets...)
No, this will look perfectly fine. This is exactly how things are supposed to work.
When you ask for a pull, you can just concatenate the individual changesets as patches, and it looks really nice. That is what I do when I send a pull request to Marcelo or Linus. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |