lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: silent semantic changes with reiser4
Rik van Riel wrote:

>On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>
>
>>All of which can be handled in userspace library code.
>>
>>What compelling reason is there for doing this in the kernel?
>>
>>
>
>There's a compelling reason to do it in userspace. If an
>unaware program copies or moves such a file with streams
>inside, it doesn't break the streams and aware programs will
>continue to see them.
>
>OTOH, if we had the streams in the kernel, unaware applications
>would continuously break the metadata and streams that the
>streams aware programs expect !
>
>
>
Well, first off, you don't want streams in the kernel, you want all the
little pieces that can be composed together into a stream if you so
choose. Streams are ugly, the pieces are all cool.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site