[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: silent semantic changes with reiser4
    David Lang wrote:
    > I also don't see why the VFS/Filesystem can't decide that (for example)
    > this tar.gz is so active that instead of storing it as a tar.gz and
    > providing a virtual directory of the contents that it instead stores the
    > directory of the contents and makes the tar.gz virtual (regenerating it as
    > needed or as extra system resources are available)

    Absolutely. It could keep both views, if they're both actively being
    used. Or more than both, if there are more. (You could think of
    compression being an alternate view, and both compressed and
    uncompressed may as well remain on disk if there's space and it's
    being actively accessed.

    > implementation wise I see headaches in doing this, but conceptually this
    > is just an optimization that could take place in the future if we fine
    > that it's needed.

    untarring a big source tree takes ages. I wouldn't like to do it
    after every reboot, if there was a .tar.bz2 tree I looked at often.
    That's why I have things like glibc untarred in my home directory.

    With good cacheing, I could cd into the .tar.bz2 files and
    _effectively_ have the performance of untarred source trees for the
    ones I look at often on my disk -- automatically cleaned if the space
    if needed for something else, too. It would be quite nice.

    -- Jamie
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.047 / U:4.424 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site