Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:53:48 +0300 | Subject | Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 | From | (Markus Törnqvist) |
| |
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 12:32:00AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > >What it breaks is the concept of a file. In ways that are ill-defined, >not portable, hard to work with, and needlessly complex. Along the >way, it breaks every single application that ever thought it knew what >a file was.
It breaks the concept of a file. In ways that offer more versatility, challenge the imagination to make even better progress and keeps Linux competing with competitors who are implementing this stuff as we speak.
I for one would truly welcome the coming of thumbnails and descriptions in picture files, because I have a real-life project going on where that would be extremely handy to have in the actual file. Were I any richer, I'd pay Namesys to have this work for me :)
>Find some silly person with an iBook and open a shell on OS X. Use cp >to copy a file with a resource fork. Oh look, the Finder has no idea >what the new file is, even though it looks exactly identical in the >shell. Isn't that _wonderful_? Now try cat < a > b on a file with a >fork. How is that ever going to work?
Then I guess OS X ships a broken implementation of cp, yes?
On the cat example, what if cat < a > b simply copies the "main stream" and not the metadata, as a feature. The key being, "as a feature"
The metadata streams could get file descriptors of their own OR another program, streamcat or something, could be written to compensate.
>I like cat < a > b. You can keep your progress.
With all due respect, I hope not too many people agree with you :)
-- mjt
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |