lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.9-rc1
    Date
    Linus Torvalds wrote:
    >
    > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Matt Mackall wrote:
    >
    >>Phew, I was worried about that. Can I get a ruling on how you intend
    >>to handle a x.y.z.1 to x.y.z.2 transition? I've got a tool that I'm
    >>looking to unbreak. My preference would be for all x.y.z.n patches to
    >>be relative to x.y.z.
    >
    >
    > Hmm.. I have no strong preferences. There _is_ obviously a well-defined
    > ordering from x.y.z.1 -> x.y.z.2 (unlike the -rcX releases that don't have
    > any ordering wrt the bugfixes), so either interdiffs or whole new full
    > diffs are totally "logical". We just have to chose one way or the other,
    > and I don't actually much care.
    >
    > Any reason for your preference?

    It should work like a bk, so two kinds of logic aren't needed.

    --
    -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
    "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
    last possible moment - but no longer" -me
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.027 / U:29.664 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site