Messages in this thread |  | | | From | Bill Davidsen <> | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.9-rc1 | | Date | Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:18:09 -0400 |
| |
Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Matt Mackall wrote: > >>Phew, I was worried about that. Can I get a ruling on how you intend >>to handle a x.y.z.1 to x.y.z.2 transition? I've got a tool that I'm >>looking to unbreak. My preference would be for all x.y.z.n patches to >>be relative to x.y.z. > > > Hmm.. I have no strong preferences. There _is_ obviously a well-defined > ordering from x.y.z.1 -> x.y.z.2 (unlike the -rcX releases that don't have > any ordering wrt the bugfixes), so either interdiffs or whole new full > diffs are totally "logical". We just have to chose one way or the other, > and I don't actually much care. > > Any reason for your preference?
It should work like a bk, so two kinds of logic aren't needed.
-- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |