[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.9-rc1
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Matt Mackall wrote:
>>Phew, I was worried about that. Can I get a ruling on how you intend
>>to handle a x.y.z.1 to x.y.z.2 transition? I've got a tool that I'm
>>looking to unbreak. My preference would be for all x.y.z.n patches to
>>be relative to x.y.z.
> Hmm.. I have no strong preferences. There _is_ obviously a well-defined
> ordering from x.y.z.1 -> x.y.z.2 (unlike the -rcX releases that don't have
> any ordering wrt the bugfixes), so either interdiffs or whole new full
> diffs are totally "logical". We just have to chose one way or the other,
> and I don't actually much care.
> Any reason for your preference?

It should work like a bk, so two kinds of logic aren't needed.

-bill davidsen (
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.147 / U:0.672 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site