Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:17:47 -0500 | From | "K.R. Foley" <> | Subject | Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P9 |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Scott Wood <scott@timesys.com> wrote: > > >>I have attached a port of the voluntary preempt patch to PPC and >>PPC64. The patch is against P7, but it applies against P8 as well. > > > thanks Scott, i've applied your patch to my tree - all the changes and > improvements look good (except for a small compilation problem on x86, > asm/time.h doesnt exist there - asm/rtc.h does). The resulting code > booted fine on an SMP and on a UP x86 system. I've uploaded -P9: > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/voluntary-preempt/voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P9 > > (there are no other changes in -P9.) > > Ingo
latency trace of ~148 usec in scsi_request? I don't know if this is real or not. Note the 79 usec here:
00000001 0.107ms (+0.079ms): sd_init_command (scsi_prep_fn)
Entire trace is here:
http://www.cybsft.com/testresults/2.6.8.1-P9/latency_trace7.txt
Is this possible? This is not the first time I have seen this. There is another one here:
http://www.cybsft.com/testresults/2.6.8.1-P9/latency_trace5.txt
kr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |