[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.9-rc1

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Phew, I was worried about that. Can I get a ruling on how you intend
> to handle a x.y.z.1 to x.y.z.2 transition? I've got a tool that I'm
> looking to unbreak. My preference would be for all x.y.z.n patches to
> be relative to x.y.z.

Hmm.. I have no strong preferences. There _is_ obviously a well-defined
ordering from x.y.z.1 -> x.y.z.2 (unlike the -rcX releases that don't have
any ordering wrt the bugfixes), so either interdiffs or whole new full
diffs are totally "logical". We just have to chose one way or the other,
and I don't actually much care.

Any reason for your preference?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.333 / U:2.532 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site