![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
It is definetely impossible to use IPTables to handle packets with incorrect checksums since NAT would drop the connection right away, otherwise I would not have been asking this question here. -----Original Message----- From: Aidas Kasparas [mailto:a.kasparas@gmc.lt] Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 8:54 AM To: Josan Kadett Subject: Re: Entirely ignoring TCP and UDP checksum in kernel level How about setting up a separate box which would listen on that 192.168.77.1 address and MASQUERADE connections to your crazy box from 192.168.1.x address? Maybe then you would no longer need to break things in kernel? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||