![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Jul 30, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 08:59:01PM +0200, Giuliano Pochini wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:43:47 -0700 > > Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > > > I had no time to do a lot of testing, but it seems that binutils 2.15 + > > > > gcc 3.3.3 is a bad one too. I didn't try to compile the kernel (which > > > > may also break), but at least I couldn't compile gcc 3.4.1 with the > > > > above combination. It seems that as doesn't get the -mxxx parameter > > > > required to compile altivec stuff. Hacking the Makefile to make it > > > > pass -Wa,-m7455 helped a little, but it eventually failed in another > > > > weird way. I hadn't time to investigate further, sorry. > > > > > > Stock gcc-3.3.3 or from the hammer branch ? > > > > Stock. > > That is interesting. Olaf, is gcc-3.3.x + binutils-2.15 one of the > combinations you've got in your matrix of toolchains? yes, it worked ok for kernel builds. gcc-3_3-branch + binutils 2.15 -- USB is for mice, FireWire is for men! sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||