[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 12:44:41PM -0700, Robert White wrote:
> Is there an argument _against_ providing an explicit flush?

well MSG_MORE is equivalent, it's an explicit non-flush...

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.067 / U:1.720 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site