lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch] Latency Tracer, voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc4-O6
    On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 07:19:58AM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
    > > I doubt SHA_CODE_SIZE will make a sufficient difference to avoid the
    > > latency problems. What we would need to do is to change the code so
    > > that the rekey operation in __check_and_rekey takes place in a
    > > workqueue. Say, something like this (warning, I haven't tested this
    > > patch; if it breaks, you get to keep both pieces):
    > >
    >
    > Tested, works for me. This should probably be pushed upstream, as well
    > as added to -P5, correct? Is there any disadvantage to doing it this
    > way?

    Great, I will be pushing this upstream very shortly.

    - Ted
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:4.146 / U:0.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site