[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: kernbench on 512p
    >>>>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:37:16 -0400, Jesse Barnes <> said:

    Jesse> On Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:29 pm, David Mosberger wrote:
    >> >>>>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:16:33 -0400, Jesse Barnes >>>>>
    >> <> said:
    Jesse> It would be nice if the patch to show which lock is contended
    Jesse> got included.
    >> Why not use q-syscollect? It will show you the caller of
    >> ia64_spinlock_contention, which is often just as good (or better
    >> ;-).

    Jesse> Because it requires guile and guile SLIB, which I've never
    Jesse> been able to setup properly on a RHEL3 based distro. Care to
    Jesse> rewrite the tools in C or something? ;)

    Why not file a bug-report to Red Hat instead? guile v1.6 and the
    guile-SLIB are quite old and rather standard.

    Of course, you could also run the analysis on a Debian system, which
    comes standard with those packages.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.020 / U:36.812 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site