[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] voluntary-preempt-
    Ingo Molnar wrote :
    > * Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
    > > > Yes, Ingo identified an issue with copy_page_range, I don't think it's
    > > > fixed yet. See the voluntary-preempt- thread.
    > >
    > > right, it's not fixed yet. It's not a trivial critical section - we
    > > are holding two locks and are mapping two atomic kmaps.
    > fortunately it's easier than i thought - neither the source pmd nor the
    > target pmd can go away so we can simply drop the locks, reschedule, and
    > remap. Does the patch below (ontop of -P3) fix the copy_page_range()
    > latencies you are seeing?
    > Ingo

    Ooops, sorry about my previous post, I had missed this one. It fixes the
    problem, thanks.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.021 / U:19.444 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site