lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    Subjectsetproctitle
        Hi all :)

    Is there any special reason not to implement setproctitle in the
    kernel? In user space is a bit difficult to implement since 'argv[0]'
    cannot grow beyond the initially allocated space, better said, it can
    grow but only changing the pointer to another place or eating the
    space occupied by the other arguments.

    proftpd has a not-very-polite set_proc_title that misses the
    final NULL, and a couple of other programs out there uses it, too.
    Applications should be free to change theirs proc titles to some
    pretty if they want, shouldn't they?

    In proc/base.c you can read about 'setproctitle(3)', that is, in
    library space (user space), not kernel space, but AFAIK only FreeBSD
    has setproctitle :?

    Thanks in advance :)

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

    --
    Linux Registered User 88736
    http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.024 / U:63.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site