Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0 | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Sun, 15 Aug 2004 20:20:22 -0400 |
| |
On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 20:25, Florian Schmidt wrote: > On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 13:56:49 +0200 > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > > > > i've uploaded the -P0 patch: > > > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/voluntary-preempt/voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0 > > I haven't tried this patch yet, but i have a question regarding the > mlockall issue: > > Jackd also uses IPC mechnisms for remote procedure calls [i think, > please correct me] and makes heavy use of shared memory. Might > mlock(all) have influence of this? is jackd maybe producing xruns > because some IPC stuff blocks when mlockall is used? > > I'm just guessing wildly and uneducatedly..
FWIW, mlockall by an unrelated normal-priority process still causes xruns in the SCHED_FIFO jackd process even when jackd is run with no clients.
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |