![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Manfred Spraul wrote: > Wrong: At least on i386 the code always waits for delivery of the IPI, > it just doesn't wait for completion of the callback. > Do you need IPIs from irq or bh context? It would be tricky to change > the current code: an IPI just delivers an interrupt without any payload. > The global 'call_data' variable contains the description of the IPI and > accesses to it must be synchronized. Oops yes you're right, i'd have to setup a seperate vector to be able to do it without the wait entirely. Sorry about the noise. Thanks, Zwane - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||