[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc4-O7
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 06:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> ok, it seems the lock-break of the outer loop was not enough - the up to
> 1024 iterations in the inner loop can generate quite high latencies too.

In some of the traces, like this one:

there are calls to voluntary_resched. How is this possible? Does it
mean that we called voluntary_resched while holding a spinlock, where we
needed to call voluntary_preempt_lock(&foo_lock), and thus failed to


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.385 / U:3.004 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site