Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:55:24 +0200 (CEST) | From | "Robert M. Stockmann" <> | Subject | Re: PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices |
| |
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Frank Steiner wrote:
> Robert M. Stockmann wrote: > > > i must agree here that getting cdrecord/cdrtools-2.0x going on the latest > > SuSE 9.x editions has been extremely tiresome. > > Because of what? We are running the cdrecord versions that SuSE > shipped with 9.0 and 9.1, and there hasn't been a single problem > for over 8 months now with three different cd and dvd burners. > So where's the problem?
I posted this on comp.os.linux.advocacy some time ago :
"SuSE 9.1 : i'm not impressed, its a drama" http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=pan.2004.07.03.05.05.30.79714@stokkie.net
There's a small typo inside and that is that :
"Not only did the suse9.1 kernel 2.4.5 ..
should read
"Not only did the suse9.1 kernel 2.6.5 ..
Robert -- Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist crashrecovery.org stock@stokkie.net
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |