[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA"
    On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:45:21PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:

    > Hi,

    Hi Roman,

    > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > > Roman, is it intentional that PCMCIA!=n is true if there's no PCMCIA
    > > option, or is it simply a bug?
    > Yes, undefined symbols have a (string) value of "" . Maybe it's time to
    > add a warning for such comparisons...

    is there any strong reason why undefined symbols aren't equivalent to
    symbols with a value of "n"?

    Many !=n seems to be bogus (especially ones from the automatic
    transition to the new Kconfig) and I'll audit them. But rewriting valid
    FOO!=n to (FOO=y || FOO=m) doesn't sound like an improvement.

    > bye, Roman



    "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
    of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
    "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
    Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.020 / U:13.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site