Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:31:12 -0400 (EDT) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks |
| |
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Chris Wright wrote:
> Thanks, James. Since these are the only concrete numbers and they are > in the noise, I see no compelling reason to change to unlikely().
There may be some way to make it ia64 specific. Is it a cpu issue, or compiler?
- James -- James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |