Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:16:29 -0400 (EDT) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks |
| |
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> * Even with selinux=0 and capability loaded, the kernel takes a > few percents in networking benchmarks (measured by HP on ia64); > this is caused by the slowliness of indirect jumps on ia64.
Is this just an ia64 issue? If so, then perhaps we should look at only penalising ia64? Otherwise, loading an LSM module is going to cause expensive false unlikely() on _every_ LSM hook.
- James -- James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |