lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.8-rc3-mm2
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 14:53, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Okay, these also failed as replacements for printk():
>> (c) local_irq_enable();
>> (d) local_irq_enable(); set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> schedule(); mdelay(1000);
>> (e) local_irq_enable(); set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> for (i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) mdelay(1);
>> set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); schedule();

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 03:52:20PM +0300, V13 wrote:
> Why don't you create a copy of printk() and start commenting out lines in
> there?

This is a very good idea.

Thanks.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.133 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site