lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.8-rc3-mm2
    On Tuesday 10 August 2004 14:53, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
    >> Okay, these also failed as replacements for printk():
    >> (c) local_irq_enable();
    >> (d) local_irq_enable(); set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
    >> schedule(); mdelay(1000);
    >> (e) local_irq_enable(); set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
    >> for (i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) mdelay(1);
    >> set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); schedule();

    On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 03:52:20PM +0300, V13 wrote:
    > Why don't you create a copy of printk() and start commenting out lines in
    > there?

    This is a very good idea.

    Thanks.


    -- wli
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.024 / U:2.476 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site