Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 09 Jul 2004 17:07:13 +1000 | | From | Nick Piggin <> | | Subject | Re: 2.6.7-mm6 |
William Lee Irwin III wrote: > William Lee Irwin III wrote: > >>>Please present a self-contained fixed-up init_idle() cleanup for me to >>>testboot. Even the one in -mm is not so, as it depends on later patches >>>to even compile. > > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 03:09:35PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>The patch I just sent (which is on top of -mm6) should hopefully >>work... if you feel like testing a solution that may still get >>vetoed by Ingo. >>Also, what compile errors are you getting? i386 seems to compile >>kernel/ fine with only the first sched- patch applied. > > > "atop -mm6" is not what I'd call a self-contained patch. I'm relatively > irritated about the approach to (or perhaps even avoidance of) testing > in isolation going on here. I have other things I very urgently need to
I'll take that as a no.
> do, and I doubt whatever I get for doing your homework for you will pay > for screwing up public presentations. I have had enough trouble in > general isolating causes of failures, so please prep this properly. >
I don't really follow you.
And you still haven't told me what compile errors you are getting. I don't have an evironment to build or test a sparc64 kernel. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |