lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 8 Jul 2004 23:58:30 -0700
FromWilliam Lee Irwin III <>
SubjectRe: 2.6.7-mm6
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Please present a self-contained fixed-up init_idle() cleanup for me to
>> testboot. Even the one in -mm is not so, as it depends on later patches
>> to even compile.

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 03:09:35PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> The patch I just sent (which is on top of -mm6) should hopefully
> work... if you feel like testing a solution that may still get
> vetoed by Ingo.
> Also, what compile errors are you getting? i386 seems to compile
> kernel/ fine with only the first sched- patch applied.

"atop -mm6" is not what I'd call a self-contained patch. I'm relatively
irritated about the approach to (or perhaps even avoidance of) testing
in isolation going on here. I have other things I very urgently need to
do, and I doubt whatever I get for doing your homework for you will pay
for screwing up public presentations. I have had enough trouble in
general isolating causes of failures, so please prep this properly.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [from the cache]
©2003-2008