![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Please present a self-contained fixed-up init_idle() cleanup for me to >> testboot. Even the one in -mm is not so, as it depends on later patches >> to even compile. On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 03:09:35PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > The patch I just sent (which is on top of -mm6) should hopefully > work... if you feel like testing a solution that may still get > vetoed by Ingo. > Also, what compile errors are you getting? i386 seems to compile > kernel/ fine with only the first sched- patch applied. "atop -mm6" is not what I'd call a self-contained patch. I'm relatively irritated about the approach to (or perhaps even avoidance of) testing in isolation going on here. I have other things I very urgently need to do, and I doubt whatever I get for doing your homework for you will pay for screwing up public presentations. I have had enough trouble in general isolating causes of failures, so please prep this properly. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||