[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> as most of you are probably aware of it, there have been complaints on
> lkml that the 2.6 kernel is not suitable for serious audio work due to
> high scheduling latencies (e.g. the Jackit people complained). I took a
> look at latencies and indeed 2.6.7 is pretty bad - latencies up to 50
> msec (!) can be easily triggered using common workloads, on fast 2GHz+
> x86 system - even when using the fully preemptible kernel!
> to solve this problem, Arjan van de Ven and I went over various kernel
> functions to determine their preemptability and we re-created from
> scratch a patch that is equivalent in performance to the 2.4 lowlatency
> patches but is different in design, impact and approach:

Looks nice.

I think you may have mixed up your trees. I think this change is the cfq
bad allocation fix which I dont think is part of your voluntary
preemption patch:

--- linux/drivers/block/cfq-iosched.c.orig
+++ linux/drivers/block/cfq-iosched.c

Otherwise, cheers! I'll give it a bit of a run and see what numbers come up.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.604 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site