![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hello Neil, Neil Brown wrote: > On Friday July 9, norberto+linux-kernel@bensa.ath.cx wrote: > > Hello,> >> > What does this mean and how do I fix it?>> If you have a degraded array, there is at-least and even chance that > raidstart will not successfully start it for you. Aha. It didn't start the array when I compiled md and raid0 built-in; that's how I discovered this. It works as modules (weird to me, but I'm not a kernel guru) > So, you should stop using raidstart. Ok. > The options are:>> 1/ use "autodetect". I'm not a big fan of this personally, but it is > much more reliable than START_ARRAY. I already have. But Gentoo uses raidstart (This is pure guessing, I need to dig into the init scripts. > This is done by set the partition type of all partitions that > contain part of an MD array to "Linux Raid Autodetect" (0xFD). > Then all arrays are found and assembled at boot time. > This requires having all of md (that you need) compiled into the > kernel, not as modules. Did I get that right? Can I get rid of raidstart and the array will be "assembled by the kernel"? > 2/ use mdadm. Read the man page about ASSEMBLE MODE. > You have an /etc/mdadm.conf that lists > - devices (or partitions) to scan > - arrays to be started > - UUID of each array > > and mdadm will find and assemble the arrays. I think I have read something about mdadm in Gentoo docs somewhere. I really need to check that out. Thanks Neil. Best regards, Norberto - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||