Messages in this thread | | | From | qubes@darkland ... | Date | Tue, 6 Jul 2004 21:46:59 -0700 | Subject | Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix |
| |
On 06-Jul 06:12, Matt Heler wrote: > Not to sound mean about this. But either you prove your claim with benchmarks > in a controlled enviroment ( that means in a private network ), or you stop > trolling and complaining. The linux kernel is a free piece of software, if > you don't like one version of it, then feel free to use some earlier version. > Otherwise please stop. > > Matt H.
I've got basicly the same problem (only worse). 2.6.7(,mm5) get ~10 bytes/sec from seattletimes.com and 25 Kbytes/sec when I "echo 0 > tcp_default_win_scale; \ echo 0 > tcp_moderate_rcvbuf;". This may be open-source where you ask users to test, but asking users to setup non-trivial HARDWARE and NETWORKS seems to be asking a bit much. YMMV, etc.
I'll get intrested if it doesn't fix its self by rc time.
Thomas (who could test on a "private network", but is a lazy bastard.) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |