Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:30:59 +0200 | | From | Tomas Szepe <> | | Subject | Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL |
| |
On Jul-06 2004, Tue, 19:05 -0700 Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org> wrote:
> According to K&R, 2nd ed, section A2.5.1 (Integer Constants): > > The type of an integer depends on its form, value and suffix. > [...] If it is unsuffixed octal or hexadecimal, it has the first > possible of these types ["in which its value can be represented" > -- from omitted]: int, unsigned int, long int, unsigned long > int.
Is it safe to assume that C99 compilers append "..., long long int, unsigned long long int" to the list?
-- Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |