[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Unnecessary barrier in sync_page()?
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:30:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> And we cannot lock the page because, err, we need to run sync_page() for
> that.

exactly ;)

> But I cannot think of any callers of sync_page() who don't have a ref on
> the inode, so...

I'm thinking, does handle_write_error() holds a ref on the inode? that's
the VM and it finds the page without passing through the inode. I'm
afraid the VM isn't safe calling lock_page, or am I overlooking
something here?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.044 / U:8.044 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site