[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.7-mm6
    On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:35:10 +0200
    Ingo Molnar <> wrote:

    > the patch below should solve this. Is it safe on sparc to do a
    > fork_by_hand() like this?

    If the regs are garbage, copy_thread() will explode as it tries
    to interpret the stack pointer in that regs value.

    The parent's regs (stored in current_thread_info() at trap time,
    and also needed by copy_thread() processing) will also be garbage
    since we're avoiding the fork syscall trap.

    In short, this won't work :)

    This is why I use kernel_thread(). Why is that so bad?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.032 / U:0.588 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site