Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.7-ck5 | | From | Redeeman <> | | Date | Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:17:08 +0200 |
| |
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 17:53 +0200, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > > John Richard Moser wrote: > >> When do you think the staircase, batch, and isometric scheduling will > >> reach mainline-quality? Do you think you'll be ready to ask Andrew to > >> merge it soon, or will it be a while before it's quite ready for that? > > > > > > Well I think they're all ready for prime time now, I just dont think > > prime time is ready for it. This is too large a change for mainline 2.6 > > which keeps -ck in business ;) > > I don't know whether this was already discussed, but what about adding > framework so that (like io-schedulers) the cpu scheduler could be chosen > on boot time? This would make it easy to test different cpu schedulers. might be a good idea, but i dont think doing such a change in 2.6 is good, but for 2.7, a good idea > > Cheers, > > Prakash > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |