Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix | From | Redeeman <> | Date | Wed, 07 Jul 2004 02:42:53 +0200 |
| |
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 15:30 -0400, Horst von Brand wrote: > Redeeman <lkml@metanurb.dk> said: > > On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 17:54 -0700, Matt Heler wrote: > > > > Ok first take benchmarks ( use wget ), and secondly results from the > > > internet vary day by day , hour to hour , minute by minute. Don't > > > expect all sites on the internet to be the same speed, or even stay the > > > same speed for that matter. For more accurate benchmark results setup a > > > personal server on your own private network and benchmark http > > > trasnfers using different kernels. > > > i am aware of this, however, what i use to benchmark is kernel.org, as i > > can see they have alot bandwith free. > > How do you know that? how i know? i dont think anyone in the matter of seconds begin to use the spare ~800mbit/s of bandwith they do not use when i try, (according to info from bwbar on kernel.org) > > > if i use kernel.org http i get 50kb/s, if i use ftp, i can easily fetch > > with 200kb/s > > Trafic shaping somewhere along the route? Much more load on HTTP than FTP? > Are they the very same machines? Under the exact same load? Are the servers > written with the same care? Are the clients? > > > also, the gnu ftp, where i took gcc3.4.1, it gave me 200kb/s > > Ditto. > > Unless you set up something where there aren't dozens of unknown variables > and a hundred or so that you have got no chance at all to even guess what > their values/effects are...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |